The environment of Public Affairs (PA) has outgrown its analog roots. For decades, influence was a combination of personal relationships, gut instinct, and reactive lobbying, or to put it more bluntly: your address- and phonebook. This traditional model is now failing to keep pace with the sheer velocity and complexity of modern governance, technology, and information flow. Policy shifts are both local and global, driven by complex and cross-sectional data, and amplified instantly across digital channels. Core challenges revolve around creating synergy over silos, while traditional government relations, regulatory, advocacy operates mostly in functional isolation, failing to connect human capital with technological intelligence. Contacts and insider knowledge are treated as the keys to kingdoms, but these kingdoms have lost their lands already. Leaks are posted on LinkedIn to show off peers how well connected you are, platforms are already connecting the dots which seem far away from each other, yet still time and resources are kept similar or are even to be slashed by thrifty management.
To master this new landscape, PA must be reimagined as an integrated system – fundamentally. The future of effective influence is defined by a powerful yet simple equation:
Public Affairs = People + Data + Workflows
This is not a linear checklist, but a dynamic, adaptive system where each element enhances the others. This integration is the only way to achieve Evidence-Based Engagement, move beyond reactive reporting, and build an influence engine that is both scalable and accountable.
‍
People: The Strategic Connectors and Human Core
‍
The "people component” remains the ultimate differentiator: the PA team, internal experts, and external stakeholders. In the integrated equation, the public affairs professional’s role pivots from generalist to strategic connector and trusted advisor. Technology enables, augments, and fosters relationships; it does not replace them.
A modern PA practitioner uses preferably intelligence before their mere intuition, to inform their judgment. This is the shift to an evidence-based engagement.
Both are necessary, internal integration as well as dynamic empathy: PA teams act as internal intelligence officers, collaborating with Legal, R&D, Risk Analysis, and Communications. They are equipped with organizational data (e.g., economic impact, research findings) before they engage. This transforms any advocacy from subjective plea to credible, fact-based consultation.
On the other hand, while data – out of connected dots – identify a key stakeholder, only people can build trust. The human touch which is deep listening, understanding personal or constituent motivations, and crafting bespoke, empathetic appeals, all this remains paramount. Not to add mix and mingle at events, receptions, podiums. To join the business card lottery a long with real-life Tinder on recurrent well-known places (famous Thursdays night-outs on Brussels’ “Place Lux”). The time saved by automation is reinvested here, into relationship building from more or less random encounters between interns and juniors to high-value exchanges.
The goal of integration is to free up human capacity, and digitization is explicitly not here to replace them. Workflows automate low-value administrative tasks and recurrent research and information gathering exercises, enabling the “people component” to achieve greater scaling and velocity. By offloading time-consuming tasks like policy summary creation, database updates, reports on quarterly basis, standard dossiers and briefings etc, practitioners gain more time for strategic thought and high-impact engagement, ensuring that human capital is deployed only where it can move the needle. Actually, this time-saving approach enables public affairs of something core to their mandate: work early on better compromise. Each day saved at the desk enables an additional stakeholder. The according workflows allow the team to activate their human network (within employees, suppliers, partners, staffers, etc) for grassroots action quickly and efficiently, scaling the people component's reach drastically.
You actually can’t even scale the “people component” as it is driven by and based on human interaction and trust. More than 50 years on, Stanford sociologist Mark Granovetter’s “The Strength of Weak Ties” is stronger than ever, even more so in the politics domain.Â
‍
Data: Intelligence for Precision…
As data isn’t the new oil but an abundant and constantly growing resource, it functions as the nervous system of an integrated PA framework, delivering the precision needed in regulatory (yes, that footnote in the draft paper on page 356 in Addendum II where in the 2nd paragraph it suggests “may apply within 3 years” (instead of 10, as you’d need to transform and you’ve previously informally agreed) will not be caught by any random magic AI summarizer and pin pointer!).
Don’t let yourself be fooled and tricked by shady AI promises like “We provide you with a 98% guarantee of correct data”. Sure, everyone of us would board a plane that crashes only 1 in 50 flights. Oh, they promise now even 99% – this plane now crashes only once every 100 flights. And this accuracy should be the foundation for any policy decisions? Please, no.
…and “Prediction”?
‍
On the other side: There are a growing bunch of tools out there who offer predictability of policy development. “Predictive insights are required for modern influence” – sounds stunning, yet what is politics all about? The unexpected, the black swans, the niche compromise, the ugly deal, the big bills. Let us agree on a healthy distrust in those who tell you lottery numbers of tomorrow’s draw, and this is the analogy for predictive data. They are just not. We can get an approach, and we may evaluate probabilities and likelinesses. Nothing is more boring than a polarized black-white approach, a politics of all-or-nothing, pole parties on the left or right who stick with their consistent, non-compromisable policies. But what do we expect from far left vs. far right to achieve results on common ground? Easy to predict how they will behave, and winding down at the same time the reputation of those who flip sides and enable a solution, maybe not perfect but hey, that’s how democracies work?
I’d be honest here: No AI will ever predict anything of real relevance in the policy / regulatory / politics which needs human effort, creativity and the will to solve an issue. Let’s not betray ourselves with supposedly accurate data while they only show some expected behavior within a bandwidth. You will get amazing overall policy and document summaries (yes, we do have this in SAVOIRR) which you will even can chat with (same, it’s there), you will get smart profiles of policy makers (yes, we have this as well in SAVOIRR) which will be the foundation of your policy CRM (yes, again, you’ll find this in SAVOIRR). And you will get news overviews, daily breakdowns, combined and aggregated insights (yes, you guessed it, we have this in SAVOIRR too) – but this will always be an approximation, a guess-timation, ballpark figures in a sense of “yes, this looks quite ok” overview. But we are far away from a no-trust situation.
Multi-Layered Data
Data must be precise, clear, unambiguous, definite, conclusive, comprehensive – no strings attached. They are sourced from four integrated layers, supporting synergy over silos:
- Legislative & policy: tracking not just the submission and movement of files, bills, documents, procedures, consultations etc, but also voting coalitions, amendment trajectories, and regulatory body commentary, e.g. from related agencies, opinion giving entities. This is the pure basics of a policy monitoring solution. Nevertheless, watch out for the details: are data acquired, hosted, historized, indexed, and refined by your provider? Are there several layers of verification to guarantee accuracy, preciseness, comprehensiveness of data? Is there a retroactive validation and correction, e.g. of re-casted votes? (SAVOIRR: yes to all!)
- Policymakers & politicians: who does what? Who has which roles, responsibilities, functions within parliaments, parties, factions? Who contributes to which policy acts, files, developments? Who gives speeches on what? Who meets whom from the lobby world? Who is lobbied on what? This is where a political CRM kicks in.
- Lobby organisations: Quite similar to policymakers, who meets which politicians on what? Who gets more, who less meetings? Who is active within which political spectrum with whom? Did I mention SAVOIRR’s political CRM functionalities?
- Your organizational knowledge: any internal information which is relevant for policy and regulatory (financial, environmental, technical) needs to be added / uploaded so it can be automatically pulled into advocacy, outreach, and policy making materials, bridging the gap between corporate action and public policy messaging (well, yes, you guessed it: SAVOIRR has an elaborate “own content” section implemented).
Additionally, it could be worth discussing what and how to monitor media and sentiment data from social media. This could be done both ways: track what policymakers say on the internet and in legacy media, but also to gauge public opinion, test message resonance on your own topics, and identify emerging narratives in real-time. As there should be options to collect and document these media items and interactions, we might acknowledge that any type of social media presence is far from authentic communication. Politicians have learned the hard way that their quotes should be polished, streamlined, vague, and even if they speak on point, it was shaped beforehand. Let’s be honest again: we know that behind the first response there will already be a bot or an intern / junior who drafts a polite “we heard you and will get back to you later”. Which PA professional wants to communicate on Twitter/X, Bluesky, Instagram, LinkedIn on behalf of their organization with the branded communication of a policy maker – so a brand-to-brand comms shall provide relevant insights? Highly doubtful. Also, legacy media monitoring is a core activity of communications, and has their own universe of access providers (think of copyright issues all along EU nation states if you start sharing!), and should be funneled via a standard workflow back into public affairs.
Evidence-based engagement: connecting the dots
Some call it the Holy Grail to find some measurable KPI which makes effort and resources spent on public affairs trackable and comparable, to prove success. It keeps being obscure – like a liability insurance policy you usually just don’t know what would have happened and how expensive it would have been without. With hearty courage we may dump the sheer counting of meetings organized, emails sent, social media encounters, roundtables participated, visibility in legacy media formats, numbers of mentions in policy-relevant outlets and so on. But it gets immediately foggy even to quantify policy outcomes: neither speed of progress of bills, or regulatory proposals aligned with organizational goals, nor number of legislative/regulatory changes influenced, nor implementation of favorable policies are hard facts: sometimes a small amendment has the power to shift organizational success for decades, and on the other side, implemented and yet abandoned or for shady trade-offs rejected legislation happens as part of political compromise, and all our smart advocacy became vain.
Nevertheless, the “data component” will be the foundation and therefore the most valuable contribution to "evidence-based engagement". We can speak of approximation, likeliness, and probability of evidence. But again, we must be honest with ourselves: remember the 99% probability of a plane not crashing? Yeah, why can a quote like "75% chance of regulatory change in Q4" could ever drive your risk forecasting, even with sophisticated models that assign probability scores to policy outcomes.
Instead, we want to see connected data dots to gain insight and wisdom. Pure data is just noise. Information starts to take shape, but knowledge management organises connections, and finally, insights highlight what really matters. This is where AI assisted insights will allow PA leaders to prioritize resources, focusing the “people component” on interventions that are strategically critical and time-sensitive.
Workflows: The Engine of Efficiency and Accountability
If people are the strategic connectors and data is the intelligence layer, then workflows are the operational engine, the part that turns insight into consistent, high-quality action. This is where modern public affairs earns its scale, its speed, and ultimately its legitimacy inside the organization.
Workflows provide the necessary infrastructure for scaling and velocity by eliminating manual friction, and they prevent blockage of information flows, literally breaking the silos. Actually, in reality it’s way easier than it sounds. It’s all about automation and task routings: when the system flags an event (data), an automated workflow immediately assigns follow-up tasks (e.g., “assign to our expert”, “ask our expert for relevancy, impact”, "draft talking points," "schedule legal review" etc) to the right people, and to spice this up, even with set deadlines. A standard practice from project management applied for public affairs – this cuts time-to-action dramatically, reduces risks of something getting lost along the way, and guarantees that at any given moment anyone could join (or leave) this process while existing insights and previous expertise is accessible and documented.
We add standardized, iterative and repeatable processes – another insight taken from agile project management. If we want to measure change (remember the evidence-based question), you must work iteratively, change only one component per time frame (to validate, measure, learn, change – rinse and repeat). This is where relatable and trusted processes enable both, transmissional communication between the PA experts and their team and every other stakeholder along the process. By digitizing processes like policy drafting or compliance reporting, workflows ensure a consistent level of quality and output across jurisdictions and issues, enabling the PA team to handle a larger volume of work without increasing headcount.
Making Intangibles Tangible (Finally)
Workflows are the bridge to solve the historic challenge of measuring and valuing intangibles by creating an indisputable record of impact. With routines applied, there is finally an audit trail, and therefore accountability: every action taken by people (meeting notes, emails sent, reports filed, amendments submitted etc) is logged against a multitude of tracks: at specific policy files (and their development and outcome: data!); against policymakers at any levels (who meets whom on what, who says what in which context, who submits, contributes, supports, opposes, blocks along with whom etc); against the internal actors of the PA team (every activity is tracked for individuals, teams, or the whole company, with a differentiated model of access, contribution, and visibility rights). Now, we may speak of an auditable record of influence.
By tracking activity and correlating it with legislative results (e.g., "This issue was defeated after X strategic meetings and the activation of Y stakeholders"), the system enables the PA function to demonstrate its return on investment (ROI) in tangible, business-oriented terms.
The Integrated Approach: High-Velocity, Adaptive Influence
This is where the equation comes alive. People + Data + Workflows isn’t just a catchy slogan — it’s a recurrent, iterative, and consistent feedback loop that keeps you ahead of the policy cycle instead of only chasing it forever.
Synergy over Silos: The Dynamic Loop
Let’s describe this system as we go:
- Data detects the change: A new amendment is tabled, a draft report is published, a committee opinion shifts.
Risk score updates instantly. - Workflows activate execution. Tasks are triggered automatically:
- prepare internal analysis
- alert business leads
- draft position updates
- schedule targeted outreach
Everyone knows what to do and when — no Slack archaeology required.
- People engage strategically: Armed with the right evidence, PA professionals initiate conversations with policymakers, coalitions, or internal teams.
- Engagement updates the system: Meeting notes feed back into the data layer → sentiment, likelihood, and risk recalibrate.
This deeply integrated system flows as an adaptive PA control center, a workspace ensuring that strategic insights are always current, a knowledge management solution to guarantee that execution is always disciplined.
Here’s the blunt truth: those public affairs teams that adopt this integrated model will outperform the ones that don’t – not because they have better lobbyists, but because they built a rock solid digitally spiced foundation, to have better systems.
Where This All Leads: Evidence, Scale, and Real Accountability
- Evidence-based engagement: You stop guessing and start showing:
- “We intervened early.”
- “We had the right coalition.”
- “We influenced the language.”
- “Here’s the proof.”
- Scaling without headcount: workflows automate the 60-70% of PA that is deskwork, admin, research, monitoring, downloading, copy-pasting, formatting, requesting, drafting, reporting. That frees people to do the actual influencing.
- A credible ROI model: With structured workflows and traceable actions, PA leaders can finally quantify impact in a way CFOs understand. This is what elevates PA from “cost center” to “strategic engine.”
Conclusion
Public Affairs profession is changing. Its complexity is rising. And the expectations from leadership have never been higher. Their function stands at a pivotal moment, and the future belongs to teams that operate within an integrated equation: Public Affairs = People + Data + Workflows. To effectively navigate the complex global environment, PA must evolve beyond traditional practices and embrace integrated reality.
This is the mandate for change:
- Embrace Synergy: Tear down the silos between relationship management, intelligence gathering, and operational execution.
- Demand Evidence: Make the shift to "evidence-based engagement," using connected data and workflows to justify every strategic move.
- Prioritize Scale: Utilize workflows and automation to achieve scaling and velocity, enable humans for higher-value strategic interactions.
- Prove Value: Implement the systems necessary for measuring and valuing intangibles, finally allowing PA to demonstrate its quantifiable ROI.
By committing to this integrated framework Public Affairs Influence = People + Data + Workflows, organizations will transform their PA function from a necessary cost center into a high-performance, adaptive engine that ensures their voice is heard and their strategic objectives are met with unparalleled effectiveness.
‍
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
